Okay, thanks.@Allsquare - The Nero post is in the 'Supporter Classifieds' forum - I'll repost it in the open classifieds tonight or tomorrow ...
Okay, thanks.@Allsquare - The Nero post is in the 'Supporter Classifieds' forum - I'll repost it in the open classifieds tonight or tomorrow ...
@Lempo - I didn't mean the pack but all the stuff he was pulling out of it ... (though one and half pounds would be my personal limit for a 3 season pack )
Ah ok, yes. Outdoor Vitals is a funny one. They have some interesting gear but also a strange selection. A bit all over the place. They even have a nice looking lightweight merino hoodie that I'm tempted with. The Shadowlight pack has some interesting ideas.
They also seem very secretive about giving the actual weight of the Shadowlight 45...Just saying "it's under 2 lbs", is pointless, as it means it could weigh to 907g...Which would hardly make it ultralight!
Sounds like it may be a lot heavier than they are willing to admit to.
What's the official weight limit for ultralight packs?
Well given the Bonfus Saccus 48 litre only weighs 350g, which is 514.6g grams lighter than the smaller Shadowlight 45, I would say any 35-50 litre pack under 500g is ultralight.
My 35 litre pack weighs 785g, so it's not ultralight...And neither is the Shadowlight 45.
The DCF Z-Pack Zero weighed all of 114 grams back in 2012. And the very first Zero was advertised as weighing 65 grams though it was little more than a stuff sack. Things change.The lightest rucksack I know of at the moment which is ideal for ultralight wild camping, is the Bonfus Iterus 38L, in black 2.92 g/sq m DCF...It weighs just 265g!
To put that in perspective, Zpacks lightest 38L pack is the Nero 38L which weighs 303g.
Bonfus's larger Saccus 48L, only weighs 350g...The nearest Zpacks equivalent, in size, is one of their 3 different 50 litre packs...The lightest of which weighs 544g and the heaviest 583g, making them much heavier.
The Iterus, in black (or white) 2.92 g/sq m DCF, costs £191.45 including delivery, from Italy.
The Zpacks Nero 38L costs $199 (£141.87), which may seem like better value, but once you add postage and customs fees on, it would probably end up costing the same as the Iterus, or even more.
Nonsense
One widely accepted Ultralight idea, is that the "big 3" items in your c5kg or under baseweight weigh no more than 3kg in total. The big 3 being shelter, pack and sleep system.
E.g
If my shelter weighs 1kg, my sleep gear 750g, then it's totally possible and acceptable to have a pack weighing 1.25kg and still have an Ultralight setup.
Some people prefer (or even need for their comfort) a framed pack like an Osprey Exos or Gossamer Gear Gorilla.
I've often hiked with people who have pack models far lighter than mine, but they are carrying more weight overall because they are carrying more stuff.(And have a less comfortable carry because of this).
Who's the more ultralight then? Who cares?
The DCF Z-Pack Zero weighed all of 114 grams back in 2012. And the very first Zero was advertised as weighing 65 grams though it was little more than a stuff sack. Things change.
Nonsense
One widely accepted Ultralight idea, is that the "big 3" items in your c5kg or under baseweight weigh no more than 3kg in total. The big 3 being shelter, pack and sleep system.
E.g
If my shelter weighs 1kg, my sleep gear 750g, then it's totally possible and acceptable to have a pack weighing 1.25kg and still have an Ultralight setup.
Some people prefer (or even need for their comfort) a framed pack like an Osprey Exos or Gossamer Gear Gorilla.
I've often hiked with people who have pack models far lighter than mine, but they are carrying more weight overall because they are carrying more stuff.(And have a less comfortable carry because of this).
Who's the more ultralight then? Who cares?
What's relevant is that a lot of people have already gone down that rabbit hole and crawled back out again.That was for the smallest version, which was only 27.5 litres, which is too small to be used for wild camping so it is irrelevent in this conversation.
The 36 litre version was truly ultralight though, as it only weighed 119g, and so was the 44 litre version which weighed 130.4g.
But, as you said yourself, they were available back in 2012, but they are not available anymore, so it is pretty pointless discussing packs you can't buy anymore.
Love to see your gear list...or a trip report
The Bonfus Saccus and the Zpacks Scout, to which you're comparing it, are very different packs other than in materials and size.
Although I assume they'll remove the Italian VAT so after UK VAT the price will be similar, I believe customs duty will be added to the cost of the Iterus.
I believe that the Bonfus products are made in Mexico so wouldn't be covered by the free trade agreement.Not sure...We are supposed to have a free trade agreement with the EU...So maybe there will be no customs fees?
@tarptent - might be worthwhile to bear the purpose of UL in mind - which is not "the lightest kit" or such similar.
UL evolved to enable larger food carries while avoiding injuries and accidents caused by too heavy loads. A low base weight isn't a big issue for an overnighter or a long weekend but it matters hugely on a thru-hike when I need to load my pack up with approx 7 days food. And perhaps carry kit for colder temps or snow/ice conditions higher up.
Secondly, every pack is a compromise - we are all different and adapt differently to thru-hike challenges. Some people are happy with a zpacks Nero for a PCT thru-hike. I wouldn't be personally - but it's been a great pack for 5 day alpine hikes. And great to carry my snowshoes and crampons for overnighters in deep snow conditions in the Pyrenees.
Most people try a few packs before hitting the 'right one' and that may change again every few years - certainly does for me. Bit comfort when carrying 12kg after a resupply is a priority for me - so my compromise is to cut out all fluff "features" many pack makers seem to love so much but I wouldn't even look at a pack without side pockets and a large rear mesh one - but each to our own (currently an Atom+)
I believe that the Bonfus products are made in Mexico so wouldn't be covered by the free trade agreement.
It is the country of manufacture that counts for the rules of origins which govern tax-free imports (as opposed to VAT). Hence the woes of UK companies that served as EU distribution hubs for Chinese-made products.But they are shipped from Italy...