EM-Chiseller
Thru Hiker
Let's get this can of worms open....
I've been on multidays with just a windshell... Combined with a brolly, it worked well. I wasn't totally miserable, but could have been if it wasn't for my alpha layer.
I've been through windproofs at a fair rate over the past couple of years... Fighting for that perfect combination of fit, function and weight.
Recently I returned to the paramo Ostro, but this time the latest incarnation called Ostro UL.
My old Ostro ticked a lot of boxes apart from weight.
Great hood, good fit, lightweight considering, hood, 3 usable pockets, draw hem, long back, fairly long front and zips for venting/access.
Which brings me to this post.
I don't find the material as breathable, considering its lighter material than its earlier incarnation.
I've struggled with a lot of brands on the breathability side. OMM, Montane(which was pretty good though) inov8, OR, MH, Marmot to name but a few...
The 'fauxdini' was great, but as an offset, wasn't totally windproof and the fit wasn't good for me due to the small sizing ( I had the largest)
For gentle walking, when a windproof makes sense.. Most are pretty good. In my experience, the best, but heaviest was the Mountain Equipment Squall... But if it was wet, cold and still windy, it took some drying and could leave me feeling windchill ( not as bad as a heavier but very comfortable Rab Borealis shirt)
So today, in heavy rain, I set off to see how long the dwr would last, and how comfy it would be with my Norrona Alpha Raw underneath.
No pack, just worn as is, with the hood up.
Tempreture was mild, not a great deal of wind, just enough to test the hood in driven rain and the shell.
I covered just over 2.5 miles in 37 minutes. With my knee, this was some good going and added sweat to go with the rain.
I was soaked... Not uncomfortable due to the Alpha and the mild tempreture (around 13C )
The norrona didn't have chance to combat the rain and the sweat... Where a buffalo for example would have done better, working on the same principle as alpha raw and a windshell.
When its not rained and hiked I've been soaked in sweat with a pack on, taken the pack off, lifted an alpha garment and my skin has been almost dry to the touch. That was my Marmot isotherm and other Alpha garments with a windproof face.
So... (I know, I've dragged this bit out) it got me to thinking...
Why use a windproof when a good breathable, quick drying waterproof shell can do the same?
Some will say weight?
Some will say, it saves wear on a more expensive waterproof?
Some will say packability?
Throwing a spanner in the works... Or a can opener....
I've a couple of waterproofs, that are low weight, built well, reliable and pretty breathable with the right layer and when they're worn in a favourable climate (humidity, wind, tempreture, activity and exposure time) and some unfavourable climates.
A classic memory is starting the Bob Graham Round last year. The wind was hard, I was pushing hard and the clag was coming in.
I donned my OMM Phantom hoody, Stretched it over my small back pack /race vest and my front pack ( RIBZ )
It worked great, especially considering it has zero venting options other than loose hem and hood down, sleeves pushed partly up.
It kept me dry from rain and comfortable from sweat. I admit, the breathability was possibly good due to the air gaps created by my packs. BUT I've worn it a few times as a windshell when there's been a threat of more than just a shower and it's performed well.
I've also got an Outdoor Research Ascent jacket and an OMM Aether smock that all perform very well in comfort, durability, function and pack size.... And are considered very lightweight.
So now, I'm thinking, on trips where weight is an equal consideration to comfort... I will possibly leave the windshell out and just use a hardshell (using the term Lightly as the Phantom. Is very soft and the others are not what I'd consider a true hardshell along the lines of a winter rated waterproof)
The weight comes into it... By water absorbed into the material of a windshell and any layer or layers beneath.
For me... Moisture from sweat seems to dry quicker than moisture from being soaked in rain.
Dear reader.... If your still with me...
Here's the kicker...
Most ultralight folks in the UK, will discredit a layer by weight. That weight that effects our choice over one garment/brand from another... Can be as small as 20g or as large as 100g+
Now we all know... A ml of water weighs a gram...
A well soaked jacket can easily add 100g, a well soaked mid or base layer can easily end up absorbing a couple of hundred gram depending on material choice... Especially some merino layers.
So now... That windshell or ultralight waterproof that has failed due to prolonged exposure or poor materials.... Is no longer ultralight, and is adding weight to be worn or carried until dry again. Same with the added weight of the soaked under garment.
Some days... The rain may not break for long enough.... So you decide to take the windshell off and don a full waterproof... Maybe even change undergarment quickly in the hope to have a fresher, drier, warmer start.
You've still the added weight to carry, wether it's worn or in your pack.
On price / expense of replacing worn out or failing waterproofs.....
A lot of us spend heavy cash on our choices... Especially as we chase the ultralight. But let me it put it into another context.
Some of us have other passions, some of us don't. Those that have other hobbies, sports, obsessions... What is spent on consumables, like football, cricket, rugby, concert tickets etc.... Fishing, cycling, diving etc... They all provide memories... Some of them very special, lifelong memories...
So what of our mountain, Moor, Long distance trail, quick overnighter memories.... I will argue... Some of the very best feelings possible... Even miserable at the time feeling's, often later become funny, educational, humble yet still great memories....
What price do we put on these?
(Going off subject.. The same could be said for a lot of our kit that we've had or expected to Las a long time)
So on the financial side... Should the cost and durability of a windshell be favoured over the cost of a slightly heavier or expensive rain jacket that can perform both tasks and possibly save weight over the duration of a trek?
I for one, couldn't put a price on some of my experiences... The price of a jacket alone, would seem cheap for such emotion.
There.... I'm sure I could lollygag some more... And I'm. Sure I will still favour leaving a hardshell at home... Or carrying both.
Looking forward to seeing/hearing your own thoughts.
I will resist replying as typing this, has made my own mind up for future trips in all but wintery seasons / climates.
Doh...bit more to say....
Obviously wind chill and its dangers are not to be taken 'lite-ly' we all know how to do what we do safely and how our choices and decisions can play out.
Stay safe folks... Stay lite... But be comfortable and hike your own hike....
Sithee
Footnote
I appreciate we all tolerate heat/cold differently and some of us may not Don a windproof until later than others and vice versa....
I've been on multidays with just a windshell... Combined with a brolly, it worked well. I wasn't totally miserable, but could have been if it wasn't for my alpha layer.
I've been through windproofs at a fair rate over the past couple of years... Fighting for that perfect combination of fit, function and weight.
Recently I returned to the paramo Ostro, but this time the latest incarnation called Ostro UL.
My old Ostro ticked a lot of boxes apart from weight.
Great hood, good fit, lightweight considering, hood, 3 usable pockets, draw hem, long back, fairly long front and zips for venting/access.
Which brings me to this post.
I don't find the material as breathable, considering its lighter material than its earlier incarnation.
I've struggled with a lot of brands on the breathability side. OMM, Montane(which was pretty good though) inov8, OR, MH, Marmot to name but a few...
The 'fauxdini' was great, but as an offset, wasn't totally windproof and the fit wasn't good for me due to the small sizing ( I had the largest)
For gentle walking, when a windproof makes sense.. Most are pretty good. In my experience, the best, but heaviest was the Mountain Equipment Squall... But if it was wet, cold and still windy, it took some drying and could leave me feeling windchill ( not as bad as a heavier but very comfortable Rab Borealis shirt)
So today, in heavy rain, I set off to see how long the dwr would last, and how comfy it would be with my Norrona Alpha Raw underneath.
No pack, just worn as is, with the hood up.
Tempreture was mild, not a great deal of wind, just enough to test the hood in driven rain and the shell.
I covered just over 2.5 miles in 37 minutes. With my knee, this was some good going and added sweat to go with the rain.
I was soaked... Not uncomfortable due to the Alpha and the mild tempreture (around 13C )
The norrona didn't have chance to combat the rain and the sweat... Where a buffalo for example would have done better, working on the same principle as alpha raw and a windshell.
When its not rained and hiked I've been soaked in sweat with a pack on, taken the pack off, lifted an alpha garment and my skin has been almost dry to the touch. That was my Marmot isotherm and other Alpha garments with a windproof face.
So... (I know, I've dragged this bit out) it got me to thinking...
Why use a windproof when a good breathable, quick drying waterproof shell can do the same?
Some will say weight?
Some will say, it saves wear on a more expensive waterproof?
Some will say packability?
Throwing a spanner in the works... Or a can opener....
I've a couple of waterproofs, that are low weight, built well, reliable and pretty breathable with the right layer and when they're worn in a favourable climate (humidity, wind, tempreture, activity and exposure time) and some unfavourable climates.
A classic memory is starting the Bob Graham Round last year. The wind was hard, I was pushing hard and the clag was coming in.
I donned my OMM Phantom hoody, Stretched it over my small back pack /race vest and my front pack ( RIBZ )
It worked great, especially considering it has zero venting options other than loose hem and hood down, sleeves pushed partly up.
It kept me dry from rain and comfortable from sweat. I admit, the breathability was possibly good due to the air gaps created by my packs. BUT I've worn it a few times as a windshell when there's been a threat of more than just a shower and it's performed well.
I've also got an Outdoor Research Ascent jacket and an OMM Aether smock that all perform very well in comfort, durability, function and pack size.... And are considered very lightweight.
So now, I'm thinking, on trips where weight is an equal consideration to comfort... I will possibly leave the windshell out and just use a hardshell (using the term Lightly as the Phantom. Is very soft and the others are not what I'd consider a true hardshell along the lines of a winter rated waterproof)
The weight comes into it... By water absorbed into the material of a windshell and any layer or layers beneath.
For me... Moisture from sweat seems to dry quicker than moisture from being soaked in rain.
Dear reader.... If your still with me...
Here's the kicker...
Most ultralight folks in the UK, will discredit a layer by weight. That weight that effects our choice over one garment/brand from another... Can be as small as 20g or as large as 100g+
Now we all know... A ml of water weighs a gram...
A well soaked jacket can easily add 100g, a well soaked mid or base layer can easily end up absorbing a couple of hundred gram depending on material choice... Especially some merino layers.
So now... That windshell or ultralight waterproof that has failed due to prolonged exposure or poor materials.... Is no longer ultralight, and is adding weight to be worn or carried until dry again. Same with the added weight of the soaked under garment.
Some days... The rain may not break for long enough.... So you decide to take the windshell off and don a full waterproof... Maybe even change undergarment quickly in the hope to have a fresher, drier, warmer start.
You've still the added weight to carry, wether it's worn or in your pack.
On price / expense of replacing worn out or failing waterproofs.....
A lot of us spend heavy cash on our choices... Especially as we chase the ultralight. But let me it put it into another context.
Some of us have other passions, some of us don't. Those that have other hobbies, sports, obsessions... What is spent on consumables, like football, cricket, rugby, concert tickets etc.... Fishing, cycling, diving etc... They all provide memories... Some of them very special, lifelong memories...
So what of our mountain, Moor, Long distance trail, quick overnighter memories.... I will argue... Some of the very best feelings possible... Even miserable at the time feeling's, often later become funny, educational, humble yet still great memories....
What price do we put on these?
(Going off subject.. The same could be said for a lot of our kit that we've had or expected to Las a long time)
So on the financial side... Should the cost and durability of a windshell be favoured over the cost of a slightly heavier or expensive rain jacket that can perform both tasks and possibly save weight over the duration of a trek?
I for one, couldn't put a price on some of my experiences... The price of a jacket alone, would seem cheap for such emotion.
There.... I'm sure I could lollygag some more... And I'm. Sure I will still favour leaving a hardshell at home... Or carrying both.
Looking forward to seeing/hearing your own thoughts.
I will resist replying as typing this, has made my own mind up for future trips in all but wintery seasons / climates.
Doh...bit more to say....
Obviously wind chill and its dangers are not to be taken 'lite-ly' we all know how to do what we do safely and how our choices and decisions can play out.
Stay safe folks... Stay lite... But be comfortable and hike your own hike....
Sithee
Footnote
I appreciate we all tolerate heat/cold differently and some of us may not Don a windproof until later than others and vice versa....
Last edited: